A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science–practice gap in ecology and conservation (2017)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: GARCIA, DIANA BERTUOL - FE ; MORSELLO, CARLA - EACH ; PARDINI, RENATA - IB
- Unidades: FE; EACH; IB
- DOI: 10.1111/brv.12385
- Subjects: ECOLOGIA; GESTÃO AMBIENTAL; COMUNICAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA; CIÊNCIA; TECNOLOGIA; SOCIEDADE; SUSTENTABILIDADE
- Keywords: Environmental policy; Environmental management; Research–implementation gap; Knowing–doing gap; Policy-making; Science communication; Transdisciplinarity; Communities of practice; Science; Technology and society; Bounded rationality
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Publisher place: West Sussex
- Date published: 2017
- Source:
- Título do periódico: Biological Reviews
- ISSN: 1469-185X
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: Online, Nov. 2017
- Este periódico é de assinatura
- Este artigo NÃO é de acesso aberto
- Cor do Acesso Aberto: closed
-
ABNT
BERTUOL-GARCIA, Diana et al. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science–practice gap in ecology and conservation. Biological Reviews, v. No 2017, 2017Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12385. Acesso em: 24 abr. 2024. -
APA
Bertuol-Garcia, D., Morsello, C., El-Hani, C. N., & Pardini, R. (2017). A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science–practice gap in ecology and conservation. Biological Reviews, No 2017. doi:10.1111/brv.12385 -
NLM
Bertuol-Garcia D, Morsello C, El-Hani CN, Pardini R. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science–practice gap in ecology and conservation [Internet]. Biological Reviews. 2017 ; No 2017[citado 2024 abr. 24 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12385 -
Vancouver
Bertuol-Garcia D, Morsello C, El-Hani CN, Pardini R. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science–practice gap in ecology and conservation [Internet]. Biological Reviews. 2017 ; No 2017[citado 2024 abr. 24 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12385 - Shared ways of thinking in Brazil about the science–practice interface in ecology and conservation
- Landscape correlates of bushmeat consumption and hunting in a post-frontier Amazonian region
- Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia
- Hunting and bushmeat consumption in post-frontier landscapes in eastern Amazonia: the importance of large-scale environmental driver
- Committing to behavior change: how to prevent dogsfrom visiting Atlantic Forest remnants?
- The science-practice interface in Ecology and Conservation: a conceptual framework and shared ways of thinking among scientists and decision-makers
- Forest cover and social relations are more important than economic factors in driving hunting and bushmeat consumption in post-frontier Amazonia
- Áreas protegidas públicas e privadas: seleção e manejo
- Unidades de Conservação públicas e privadas: seleção e manejo no Brasil e no Pantanal Mato-grossense
- Children's use of time and traditional ecological learning. A case study in two Amazonian indigenous societies
Informações sobre o DOI: 10.1111/brv.12385 (Fonte: oaDOI API)
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
