Source: World journal of gastroenterology. Unidade: FM
Subjects: CATÉTERES DE DEMORA, COMPLICAÇÕES PÓS-OPERATÓRIAS, PROCEDIMENTOS CIRÚRGICOS DO SISTEMA DIGESTÓRIO, CATETERISMO
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
FURUYA, Carlos Kiyoshi et al. Papillary fistulotomy vs conventional cannulation for endoscopic biliary access: A prospective randomized trial. World journal of gastroenterology, v. 24, n. 16, p. 1803-1811, 2018Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1803. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2024.APA
Furuya, C. K., Sakai, P., Otoch, J. P., Moura, E. G. H. de, Artifon, E. L. de A., Prudencio, L. L., et al. (2018). Papillary fistulotomy vs conventional cannulation for endoscopic biliary access: A prospective randomized trial. World journal of gastroenterology, 24( 16), 1803-1811. doi:10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1803NLM
Furuya CK, Sakai P, Otoch JP, Moura EGH de, Artifon EL de A, Prudencio LL, Cheng S, Marinho FRT. Papillary fistulotomy vs conventional cannulation for endoscopic biliary access: A prospective randomized trial [Internet]. World journal of gastroenterology. 2018 ; 24( 16): 1803-1811.[citado 2024 jun. 10 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1803Vancouver
Furuya CK, Sakai P, Otoch JP, Moura EGH de, Artifon EL de A, Prudencio LL, Cheng S, Marinho FRT. Papillary fistulotomy vs conventional cannulation for endoscopic biliary access: A prospective randomized trial [Internet]. World journal of gastroenterology. 2018 ; 24( 16): 1803-1811.[citado 2024 jun. 10 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1803