Source: Clinical Oral Implants Research. Unidade: FORP
Subjects: BIOMATERIAIS, REGENERAÇÃO ÓSSEA, EXPERIMENTOS ANIMAIS
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
RAMOS, Umberto Demoner et al. Comparison between two antimicrobial protocols with or without guided bone regeneration in the treatment of peri-implantitis: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 28, n. 11, p. 1388-1395, 2017Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12998. Acesso em: 23 maio 2024.APA
Ramos, U. D., Suaid, F. A., Wikesjö, U. M. E., Susin, C., Taba Júnior, M., & Novaes Júnior, A. B. (2017). Comparison between two antimicrobial protocols with or without guided bone regeneration in the treatment of peri-implantitis: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28( 11), 1388-1395. doi:10.1111/clr.12998NLM
Ramos UD, Suaid FA, Wikesjö UME, Susin C, Taba Júnior M, Novaes Júnior AB. Comparison between two antimicrobial protocols with or without guided bone regeneration in the treatment of peri-implantitis: a histomorphometric study in dogs [Internet]. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2017 ; 28( 11): 1388-1395.[citado 2024 maio 23 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12998Vancouver
Ramos UD, Suaid FA, Wikesjö UME, Susin C, Taba Júnior M, Novaes Júnior AB. Comparison between two antimicrobial protocols with or without guided bone regeneration in the treatment of peri-implantitis: a histomorphometric study in dogs [Internet]. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2017 ; 28( 11): 1388-1395.[citado 2024 maio 23 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12998
