Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test (2004)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: ARAUJO, PAULO AMARANTE DE - FOB ; FRANCO, EDUARDO BATISTA - FOB ; MONDELLI, RAFAEL FRANCISCO LIA - FOB
- Unidade: FOB
- Subjects: RESINAS COMPOSTAS; ESCOVAÇÃO DENTÁRIA (SIMULAÇÃO); ESCOVAÇÃO DENTÁRIA (TESTES)
- Language: Inglês
- Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the wear resistance of five different packable composites versus two different composite controls using a laboratory toothbrushing simulation test. Materials and Methods: Twelve samples measuring 5 mm in diameter and 3 mm thick were prepared from the following resin composites: Packable resin composites SureFil (Dentsply Ind. Com. Ltda, Petropolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), Alert (Jeneric Pentron Incorporated, Wallingford, CT, USA), Filtek P60 (3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA), Prodigy Condensable (sds Kerr, Orange CA, USA), Solitaire (Heraeus Kulzer GmbH, Wehrheim, Germany), and control resin composites Z100 Restorative (3M ESPE) and Silux Plus (3M ESPE). Finishing and polishing were conducted with Sof-Lex disks (3M ESPE), and baseline weight (grams) and surface roughness (measured with Hommel Tester T 1000, Hommelwerke, GmbH, Alte Tuttinger Strebe 20. D-7730 VS-Schwenningen) were recorded. Specimens were aged for 2 weeks until they reached a weight that remained constant for 5 consecutive days, and then were subjected to 100,000 cycles of brushing (representative of 4.2 yr) using a toothbrushing testing machine. Toothbrush heads with soft bristle tips (Colgate Classic, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil) with dentifrice suspension (Colgate MFP, Colgate-Palmolive Co.) in deionized water were used under a 200 g load. Changes in weight and surface roughness were determined aftertoothbrushing cycles. Results: Significant differences of weight loss and surface roughness were found (paired t-test, p < .05). Weight loss percentage (mean [SD]) ranged from 0.38 to 1.69% (analysis of variance and Tukey's least significant difference, p <.05); the weight loss of the materials ranked from least to most as follows: SureFil (0.38 [0.56]), Alert (0.52 [0.18]), Z100 (1.16 [0.27]), Filtek P60 (1.31 [0.17]), Solitaire (1.51 [0.45]), Prodigy Condensable (1.55 [0.47]), and Silux Plus (1.69 [0.66]). Regarding surface roughness, Prodigy Condensable (0.19 [0.08]), Solitaire (0.28 [0.06]), and Z100 (0.30 [0.07]) became less rough after toothbrushing, whereas all the others were rendered rougher: Alert (0.49 [0.29]), Filtek P60 (0.28 [0.08]), Silux Plus (0.39 [0.09]), and SureFil (0.81 [0.32]). Conclusion: SureFil and Alert were statistically more resistant to wear (less weight loss) than were the other materials. SureFil became significantly rougher than did all the others.
- Imprenta:
- Source:
- Título do periódico: Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
- ISSN: 1496-4155
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 16, n. 5, p. 303-315, 2004
-
ABNT
WANG, Linda et al. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, v. 16, n. 5, p. 303-315, 2004Tradução . . Acesso em: 23 abr. 2024. -
APA
Wang, L., Garcia, F. C. P., Araújo, P. A. de, Franco, E. B., & Mondelli, R. F. L. (2004). Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 16( 5), 303-315. -
NLM
Wang L, Garcia FCP, Araújo PA de, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2004 ; 16( 5): 303-315.[citado 2024 abr. 23 ] -
Vancouver
Wang L, Garcia FCP, Araújo PA de, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2004 ; 16( 5): 303-315.[citado 2024 abr. 23 ] - Evaluación de las resinas compuestas condensables después de simular cepillado
- Condensable composites resins wear after simulated tootbrushing
- Resinas compostas condensáveis submetidas à escovação simulada
- Evaluación de las resinas compuestas condensales después de simular cepillado
- Evaluación de los compómeros después de similar cepillado dental
- Evaluation of compomers after simulated toothbrushing
- Evaluation of condensable composites resins after simulated toothbrushing
- Evaluation of condensable composites resins after simulated toothbrushing
- Resinas compostas condensáveis submetidas à escovação simulada
- Evaluation of the roughness and mass loss of the flowable composites after simulated toothbrushing abrasion
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
