Ver registro no DEDALUS
Exportar registro bibliográfico

Metrics


Metrics:

Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters? (2011)

  • Authors:
  • USP affiliated authors: DEFINO, HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO - FMRP
  • USP Schools: FMRP
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1808-4
  • Subjects: PROCEDIMENTOS ORTOPÉDICOS (ECONOMIA;INSTRUMENTAÇÃO); ESCOLIOSE (RADIOGRAFIA;CIRURGIA); VÉRTEBRAS TORÁCICAS
  • Language: Inglês
  • Imprenta:
  • Source:
  • Acesso online ao documento

    Online accessDOI or search this record in
    Informações sobre o DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1808-4 (Fonte: oaDOI API)
    • Este periódico é de assinatura
    • Este artigo é de acesso aberto
    • URL de acesso aberto
    • Cor do Acesso Aberto: green
    Informações sobre o Citescore
  • Título: European Spine Journal

    ISSN: 0940-6719

    Citescore - 2017: 2.35

    SJR - 2017: 1.535

    SNIP - 2017: 1.419


  • Exemplares físicos disponíveis nas Bibliotecas da USP
    BibliotecaCód. de barrasNúm. de chamada
    FMRP2290668pcd 2290668 Estantes Deslizantes
    How to cite
    A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas

    • ABNT

      YANG, Scott; JONES-QUAIDOO, Sean M.; EAGER, Matthew; et al. Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters? European Spine Journal, Heidelberg, v. 20, n. 7, p. 1039-1047, 2011. Disponível em: < http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1808-4 > DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1808-4.
    • APA

      Yang, S., Jones-Quaidoo, S. M., Eager, M., Griffin, J. W., Reddi, V., Novicoff, W., et al. (2011). Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters? European Spine Journal, 20( 7), 1039-1047. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1808-4
    • NLM

      Yang S, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Eager M, Griffin JW, Reddi V, Novicoff W, Shilt J, Bersusky E, Defino HLA, Ouellet J, Arlet V. Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters? [Internet]. European Spine Journal. 2011 ; 20( 7): 1039-1047.Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1808-4
    • Vancouver

      Yang S, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Eager M, Griffin JW, Reddi V, Novicoff W, Shilt J, Bersusky E, Defino HLA, Ouellet J, Arlet V. Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters? [Internet]. European Spine Journal. 2011 ; 20( 7): 1039-1047.Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1808-4

    Referências citadas na obra
    Cuartas E, Rasouli A, O’Brien M, Shufflebarger HL (2009) Use of all-pedicle-screw constructs in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17(9):550–561
    Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, Bridwell KH, Cho SK, Cheh G et al (2006) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(3):291–298
    Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, Arlet V (2010) Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(11):E465–E470
    Di Silvestre M, Parisini P, Lolli F, Bakaloudis G (2007) Complications of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(15):1655–1661
    Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, Manna B (2004) Maintenance of trunk deformity correction following posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(16):1782–1788
    Goldberg CJ, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of brace treatment on the incidence of surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(1):42–47
    Iwahara T, Imai M, Atsuta Y (1998) Quantification of cosmesis for patients affected by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 7(1):12–15
    Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Rigo M, Weiss HR (2006) Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients. SOSORT 2005 Consensus paper. Scoliosis 1:4
    Theologis TN, Jefferson RJ, Simpson AH, Turner-Smith AR, Fairbank JC (1993) Quantifying the cosmetic defect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(7):909–912
    Zaina F, Negrini S, Atanasio S (2009) TRACE (trunk aesthetic clinical evaluation), a routine clinical tool to evaluate aesthetics in scoliosis patients: development from the aesthetic index (AI) and repeatability. Scoliosis 4:3
    Donaldson S, Hedden D, Stephens D, Alman B, Howard A, Narayanan U et al (2007) Surgeon reliability in rating physical deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(3):363–367
    Tredwell SJ, Bannon M (1988) The use of the ISIS optical scanner in the management of the braced adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13(10):1104–1105
    Weisz I, Jefferson RJ, Turner-Smith AR, Houghton GR, Harris JD (1988) ISIS scanning: a useful assessment technique in the management of scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13(4):405–408
    Sahlstrand T (1986) The clinical value of Moire topography in the management of scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11(5):409–417
    Clements DH, Betz RR, Newton PO, Rohmiller M, Marks MC, Bastrom T (2009) Correlation of scoliosis curve correction with the number and type of fixation anchors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(20):2147–2150
    Quan GM, Gibson MJ (2010) Correction of main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does higher implant density improve correction? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(5):562–567
    Arlet V, Shilt J, Bersusky E, Abel M, Ouellet JA, Evans D et al (2008) Experience with an online prospective database on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: development and implementation. Eur Spine J 17(11):1497–1506
    Rhee JM, Bridwell KH, Won DS, Lenke LG, Chotigavanichaya C, Hanson DS (2002) Sagittal plane analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of anterior versus posterior instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(21):2350–2356
    Snyder RG, Spencer ML, Owings CL et al (1979) Anthropometry of infants, children and youths to age 18 for product safety design SP-450. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale
    Bunnell WP (1993) Outcome of spinal screening. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(12):1572–1580
    Bunnell WP (1984) An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(9):1381–1387
    D’Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Merola A et al (2000) Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(14):1795–1802
    Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Sides B, Blanke K (2004) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(18):2040–2048
    Vora V, Crawford A, Babekhir N, Boachie-Adjei O, Lenke L, Peskin M et al (2007) A pedicle screw construct gives an enhanced posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis when compared with other constructs: myth or reality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(17):1869–1874
    Aaro S, Ohlen G (1983) The effect of Harrington instrumentation on the sagittal configuration and mobility of the spine in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8(6):570–575
    Burton DC, Asher MA, Lai SM (1999) The selection of fusion levels using torsional correction techniques in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(16):1728–1739
    Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachemson A (1983) Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8(6):576–584
    Takahashi S, Delecrin J, Passuti N (1997) Changes in the unfused lumbar spine in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. A 5- to 9-year assessment after cotrel-dubousset instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(5):517,23; discussion 524
    Lowenstein JE, Matsumoto H, Vitale MG, Weidenbaum M, Gomez JA, Lee FY et al (2007) Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(4):448–452
    LR A Jr, Lenke LG, Keeler KA, Kim YJ, Buchowski JM, Cheh G et al (2008) Operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs: minimum three-year follow-up of one hundred fourteen cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(14):1598–1604
    Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Kamath G, Peelle MW, Bridwell KH (2006) Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(20):2400–2404
    Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Schootman M (2005) Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(18):2061–2067
    Rumsey N, Harcourt D (2004) Body image and disfigurement: issues and interventions. Body Image 1(1):83–97
    Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, Nachemson AL (2001) Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 10(4):278–288
    Orvomaa E (1998) Psychological evaluations of patients operated for idiopathic scoliosis by the Harrington method. Int J Rehabil Res 21(2):169–178
    Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Peterson KK, Spoonamore MJ, Ponseti IV (2003) Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. JAMA 289(5):559–567
    Payne WK III, Ogilvie JW, Resnick MD, Kane RL, Transfeldt EE, Blum RW (1997) Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(12):1380–1384
    Kotwicki T, Negrini S, Grivas TB, Rigo M, Maruyama T, Durmala J et al (2009) Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities—6th SOSORT consensus paper. Scoliosis 4:26
    Asghar J, Samdani AF, Pahys JM, D’Andrea LP, Guille JT, Clements DH et al (2009) Computed tomography evaluation of rotation correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of an all pedicle screw construct versus a hook-rod system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(8):804–807
    Raso VJ, Lou E, Hill DL, Mahood JK, Moreau MJ, Durdle NG (1998) Trunk distortion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 18(2):222–226
    King HA (1988) Selection of fusion levels for posterior instrumentation and fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 19(2):247–255
    Margulies JY, Floman Y, Robin GC, Neuwirth MG, Kuflik P, Weidenbaum M et al (1998) An algorithm for selection of instrumentation levels in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 7(2):88–94
    Winter RB (1989) The idiopathic double thoracic curve pattern. Its recognition and surgical management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14(12):1287–1292
    Shufflebarger HL, Macagno A, Marks M, Bastrom T, Betz RR, Newton PO, et al (2009) Left shoulder elevation (LSE): an unexpected consequence of surgical correction of Lenke 1 curves. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Las Vegas
    Arlet V, Ouellet JA, Shilt J, Shen FH, Wood K, Chan D et al (2009) Subjective evaluation of treatment outcomes of instrumentation with pedicle screws or hybrid constructs in Lenke Type 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: what happens when judges are blinded to the instrumentation? Eur Spine J 18(12):1927–1935