Ver registro no DEDALUS
Exportar registro bibliográfico

Metrics


Metrics:

Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex (2015)

  • Authors:
  • USP affiliated authors: VENTURA, DORA SELMA FIX - IP
  • USP Schools: IP
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4199-7
  • Subjects: VISÃO
  • Language: Inglês
  • Imprenta:
  • Source:
  • Acesso online ao documento

    Online accessDOI or search this record in
    Informações sobre o DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4199-7 (Fonte: oaDOI API)
    • Este periódico é de assinatura
    • Este artigo NÃO é de acesso aberto
    • Cor do Acesso Aberto: closed
    Informações sobre o Citescore
  • Título: Experimental Brain Research

    ISSN: 0014-4819

    Citescore - 2017: 2.02

    SJR - 2017: 0.913

    SNIP - 2017: 0.832


  • Exemplares físicos disponíveis nas Bibliotecas da USP
    BibliotecaCód. de barrasNúm. de chamada
    IP2716969-10Periódico (AM=VDo/260)
    How to cite
    A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas

    • ABNT

      COSTA, Thiago L; HAMER, Russell; NAGY, Balázs V.; et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research, Berlin, v. 233, p. 1213-1223, 2015. Disponível em: < http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-015-4199-7#page-1 > DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4199-7.
    • APA

      Costa, T. L., Hamer, R., Nagy, B. V., Barboni, M. T. S., Gualtieri, M., Boggio, P. S., & Ventura, D. S. F. (2015). Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 233, 1213-1223. doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4199-7
    • NLM

      Costa TL, Hamer R, Nagy BV, Barboni MTS, Gualtieri M, Boggio PS, Ventura DSF. Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex [Internet]. Experimental Brain Research. 2015 ; 233 1213-1223.Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-015-4199-7#page-1
    • Vancouver

      Costa TL, Hamer R, Nagy BV, Barboni MTS, Gualtieri M, Boggio PS, Ventura DSF. Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex [Internet]. Experimental Brain Research. 2015 ; 233 1213-1223.Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-015-4199-7#page-1

    Referências citadas na obra
    Antal A, Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2001) External modulation of visual perception in humans. Neuroreport 12:3553–3555
    Antal A, Kincses TZ, Nitsche MA, Bartfai O, Paulus W (2004) Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. IOVS 45:702–707
    Bikson M, Rahman A (2013) Origins of specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms. Front Hum Neurosci 7:1–5
    Brunoni AR et al (2012) Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 5(3):175–195
    Brunoni AR, Valiengo L, Baccaro A, Zanão TA, de Oliveira JF, Goulart A, Boggio PS, Lotufo PA, Benseñor IM, Fregni F (2013) The sertraline vs electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry 6:1–9
    Callaway E (2005) Structure and function of parallel pathways in the primate early visual system. J Physiol 566:13–19
    Costa TL, Nagy BV, Barboni MT, Boggio PS, Ventura DF (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates human color discrimination in a pathway-specific manner. Front Psychiatry 3:1–10
    De Valois KK (1977) Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity Vision Res. 17:1057–1065
    Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K, Schambra HM, Ji Y, Cohen LG, Lu B (2010) Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron 66(2):198–204
    Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG (2006) Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117(4):845–850
    García-Pérez MA (1998) Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: asymptotic and small-sample properties. Vis Res 38(12):1861–1881
    Hamer RD, Carvalho FA, Ventura DF (2013) Effect of contrast and gaps on sweep VEP measurement of human cortical vernier responses. Psychol Neurosci 6:199–212
    Hou C, Good WV, Norcia AM (2007) Validation study of VEP vernier acuity in normal-vision and amblyopic adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(9):4070–4078
    Hou C, Norcia AM, Madan A, Tith S, Agarwal R, Good WV (2011) Visual cortical function in very low birth weight infants without retinal or cerebral pathology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(12):9091–9098
    Iuculano T, Cohen Kadosh RC (2013) The mental cost of cognitive enhancement. J Neurosci 33:4482–4486
    Kabakov AY, Muller PA, Pascual-Leone A, Jensen FE, Rotenberg A (2012) Contribution of axonal orientation to pathway-dependent modulation of excitatory transmission by direct current stimulation in isolated rat hippocampus. J Neurophysiol 107:1881–1889
    Kar K, Krekelberg B (2014) Transcranial alternating current stimulation attenuates visual motion adaptation. J Neurosci 34(21):7334–7340
    Kraft A, Roehmel J, Olma M, Schmidt S, Irlbacher K, Brandt S (2010) Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry. Exp Brain Res 207:283–290
    Kuo MF, Nitsche MA (2012) Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on cognition. Clin EEG Neurosci 43(3):192–199
    Lapenta OM, Minati L, Fregni F, Boggio PS (2013) Je pense donc je fais: transcranial direct current stimulation modulates brain oscillations associated with motor imagery and movement observation. Front Hum Neurosci 7:246
    Lennie P, Movshon JA (2005) Coding of color and form in the geniculostriate visual pathway (invited review). J Opt Soc Am A 22(10):2013–2033
    Mata ML, Ringach DL (2005) Spatial overlap on ON and OFF subregions and its relations to response modulation ratio in macaque primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 93:919–928
    Mirabella G, Kjaer PK, Norcia AM, Good WV, Madan A (2006) Visual development in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Res 60(4):435–439
    Miranda PC, Lomarev M, Hallett M (2006) Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117:1623–1629
    Norcia AM, Wesemann W, Manny RE (1999) Electrophysiological correlates of vernier and relative motion mechanisms in human visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 16:1123–1131
    Plow EB, Obretenova SN, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A, Merabet LB (2012) Comparison of visual field training for hemianopia with active versus sham transcranial direct cortical stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26:616–626
    Pokorny J, Smith VC (1997) Psychophysical signatures associated with magnocellular and parvocellular pathway contrast gain. J Opt Soc Am A 14(9):2477–2487
    Priebe JN, Ferster D (2012) Mechanisms of neuronal computation in mammalian visual cortex. Neuron 75:194–208
    Ranieri F, Podda MV, Riccardi E, Frisullo G, Dileone M, Profice P, Grassi C (2012) Modulation of LTP at rat hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses by direct current stimulation. J Neurophysiol 107(7):1868–1880
    Sincich LC, Horton JC (2005) The circuitry of V1 and V2: integration of color, form, and motion. Ann Rev Neurosci 28:303–326
    Spiegel D, Byblow W, Hess RF, Thompson B (2013) Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation transiently improves contrast sensitivity and normalizes visual cortex activation in individuals with amblyopia. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27:760–769
    Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA (2011) Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurocientist 17:37–53
    Sun H, Swanson WH, Arvidson B, Dul MW (2008) Assessment of contrast gain signature in inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in patients with glaucoma. Vis Res 48:2633–2641
    Tang Y, Norcia AM (1995) An adaptive filter for steady-state evoked responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro 96:268–277
    Victor JD, Mast J (1991) A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 78(5):378–388
    Wagner S, Rampersad SM, Aydin Ü, Vorwerk J, Oostendorp TF, Neuling T, Wolters CH (2014) Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model. J Neural Eng 11(1):016002
    Westheimer G (2007) The on-off dichotomy in visual processing: from receptors to perception. Prog Retinal Eye Res 26:636–648
    Wright JM, Krekelberg B (2014) Transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial localization. J Vis 14(9):5. doi: 10.1167/14.9.5
    Zaghi S, Acar M, Hultgren B, Boggio PS, Fregni F (2010) Noninvasive brain stimulation with low-intensity electrical currents: putative mechanisms of action for direct and alternating current. Neuroscientist 16:285–307