A formula combining age, AMH, AFC and FSH is more accurate than individual markers in predicting poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good prognosis patients (2015)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: FERRIANI, RUI ALBERTO - FMRP ; MARTINS, WELLINGTON DE PAULA - FMRP ; NAVARRO, PAULA ANDREA DE ALBUQUERQUE SALLES - FMRP
- Unidade: FMRP
- Subjects: INFERTILIDADE FEMININA; HORMÔNIO FOLÍCULO-ESTIMULANTE
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Publisher place: Philadelphia
- Date published: 2015
- Source:
- Título do periódico: Fertility and Sterility
- ISSN: 0015-0282
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 104, n. 3, suppl., p. e330-e331, res. P-654, 2015
- Conference titles: Annual Meeting of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)
-
ABNT
PALHARES, M. B. et al. A formula combining age, AMH, AFC and FSH is more accurate than individual markers in predicting poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good prognosis patients. Fertility and Sterility. Philadelphia: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. Disponível em: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(15)01533-2/pdf. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2024. , 2015 -
APA
Palhares, M. B., Ferriani, R. A., Martins, W. de P., & Navarro, P. A. de A. S. (2015). A formula combining age, AMH, AFC and FSH is more accurate than individual markers in predicting poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good prognosis patients. Fertility and Sterility. Philadelphia: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. Recuperado de http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(15)01533-2/pdf -
NLM
Palhares MB, Ferriani RA, Martins W de P, Navarro PA de AS. A formula combining age, AMH, AFC and FSH is more accurate than individual markers in predicting poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good prognosis patients [Internet]. Fertility and Sterility. 2015 ; 104( 3): e330-e331.[citado 2024 abr. 23 ] Available from: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(15)01533-2/pdf -
Vancouver
Palhares MB, Ferriani RA, Martins W de P, Navarro PA de AS. A formula combining age, AMH, AFC and FSH is more accurate than individual markers in predicting poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good prognosis patients [Internet]. Fertility and Sterility. 2015 ; 104( 3): e330-e331.[citado 2024 abr. 23 ] Available from: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(15)01533-2/pdf - GnRH agonist during luteal phase for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Ovarian response is a rather than thin endometrium or the presence of an endometrioma is a better predictor of clinical pregnancy rates following embryo transfer than is thin endometrium or presence of an endometrioma
- Subclinical hypothyroidism and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes
- Time-lapse embryo imaging for improving reproductive outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Antral follicle count might be underestimated in the presence of an ovarian endometrioma. [Cartal]
- Dydrogesterone versus progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- An attempt to reduce the costs of assisted reproductive techniques: a pilot randomised controlled trial
- Assessment of sexual function in infertile women in a gynecological care setting
- GnRH agonist during luteal phase for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
