Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia (2016)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: MORSELLO, CARLA - EACH ; PARDINI, RENATA - IB
- Unidades: EACH; IB
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167691
- Subjects: FLORESTAS TROPICAIS; POPULAÇÃO RURAL; BIODIVERSIDADE; DESMATAMENTO; CAÇA; ANIMAIS SILVESTRES; SUSTENTABILIDADE
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Publisher place: San Francisco
- Date published: 2016
- Source:
- Este periódico é de acesso aberto
- Este artigo é de acesso aberto
- URL de acesso aberto
- Cor do Acesso Aberto: gold
- Licença: cc-by
-
ABNT
TORRES, Patricia Carignano et al. Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia. PLOS ONE, v. 11, n. 12, 2016Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167691. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2024. -
APA
Torres, P. C., Morsello, C., Parry, L., & Pardini, R. (2016). Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia. PLOS ONE, 11( 12). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167691 -
NLM
Torres PC, Morsello C, Parry L, Pardini R. Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia [Internet]. PLOS ONE. 2016 ; 11( 12):[citado 2024 mar. 19 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167691 -
Vancouver
Torres PC, Morsello C, Parry L, Pardini R. Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia [Internet]. PLOS ONE. 2016 ; 11( 12):[citado 2024 mar. 19 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167691 - Landscape correlates of bushmeat consumption and hunting in a post-frontier Amazonian region
- Hunting and bushmeat consumption in post-frontier landscapes in eastern Amazonia: the importance of large-scale environmental driver
- Committing to behavior change: how to prevent dogsfrom visiting Atlantic Forest remnants?
- A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science–practice gap in ecology and conservation
- Forest cover and social relations are more important than economic factors in driving hunting and bushmeat consumption in post-frontier Amazonia
- Shared ways of thinking in Brazil about the science–practice interface in ecology and conservation
- Áreas protegidas públicas e privadas: seleção e manejo
- Unidades de Conservação públicas e privadas: seleção e manejo no Brasil e no Pantanal Mato-grossense
- Children's use of time and traditional ecological learning. A case study in two Amazonian indigenous societies
- Does trading non-timber forest products drive specialisation in products gathered for consumption? Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon
Informações sobre o DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167691 (Fonte: oaDOI API)
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas