Source: Anesthesia Progress. Unidade: FOB
Subjects: EXTRAÇÃO DENTÁRIA, MOLAR, INFILTRAÇÃO DENTÁRIA
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
LIMA JÚNIOR, José Lacet et al. Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: a pilot study. Anesthesia Progress, v. 60, n. 2, p. 42-45, 2013Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-60.2.42. Acesso em: 01 jun. 2024.APA
Lima Júnior, J. L., Dias-Ribeiro, E., Ferreira-Rocha, J., Soares, R., Costa, F. W. G., Fan, S., & Sant’Ana, E. (2013). Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: a pilot study. Anesthesia Progress, 60( 2), 42-45. doi:10.2344/0003-3006-60.2.42NLM
Lima Júnior JL, Dias-Ribeiro E, Ferreira-Rocha J, Soares R, Costa FWG, Fan S, Sant’Ana E. Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: a pilot study [Internet]. Anesthesia Progress. 2013 ; 60( 2): 42-45.[citado 2024 jun. 01 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-60.2.42Vancouver
Lima Júnior JL, Dias-Ribeiro E, Ferreira-Rocha J, Soares R, Costa FWG, Fan S, Sant’Ana E. Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: a pilot study [Internet]. Anesthesia Progress. 2013 ; 60( 2): 42-45.[citado 2024 jun. 01 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-60.2.42
